EN 301 549 · WCAG 2.2 AA · European Accessibility Act

Automated scanners find 30% of your accessibility issues. I find the rest and hand your engineers tickets, not a PDF.

A gap audit that translates legal accessibility mandates into a prioritized, engineering-ready backlog — scoped, estimated, and ready to assign in your sprint tomorrow. Pricing on request.

Audit basis: EN 301 549 (v3.2.1) · WCAG 2.2 AA · EAA deadline 28 June 2025 — already in forceDelivered as: Jira CSV · Linear import · GitHub Issues · Notion table

Why this, why now

If you sell digital products or services in the EU, EN 301 549 compliance is already enforceable. Most teams don't have a compliance gap — they have a translation gap: nobody has turned "meet WCAG 2.2 AA" into work an engineer can pick up.

01

Scanners miss what matters

axe-core and Lighthouse catch missing alt text and contrast. They can't tell you if your focus order is logical or your custom widgets are keyboard-operable.

02

Reports don't ship fixes

A 60-page compliance PDF tells legal you did something. It doesn't tell a frontend engineer which token to change.

03

Audit and build are usually split

Most auditors don't touch code. I do both — nothing gets lost in the handoff.

Before you email

A few things that usually come up before someone books the audit.